Scale Mismatches: How do you fix ‘em -- (Cumming et al. 2006)

In short, scale mismatches are a product of ill-sized governance mechanisms when compared to the social-ecological systems they are intended to regulate.  These mismatches often result in inefficiencies, insufficiencies, and a loss of adaptive capacity within both the human and natural systems.

Although the research of scale mismatches is still limited and inchoate, Cumming et al (2006) attempt to provide the beginning of a skeletal framework for how to address scale mismatches. 

Much like problems with personal addiction, the authors suggest the first step in addressing scale mismatch is to acknowledge and be aware that a mismatch between ecological and institutional scales does exist.

 

The second step is to formulate an active approach, or working model that can be used to develop flexible learning institutions.  In essence, the authors are arguing for the emergence of adaptive governance frameworks such as those mentioned in the previous post. 

However, transforming management institutions is a difficult task.  In the short-term, the authors suggest taking common-sense approaches such as modifying boundary locations or altering their properties ie. increasing permeability through fence removal. 

The real impact of these recommendations for dealing with scale mismatches is to make readily apparent that there are, in fact, no established methods for rectifying them.  The solutions offered are vague, with little practical value at this point.  From my perspective, more comprehensive work is warranted to address what is arguably a critical component of social-ecological governance. 

--

Cumming, G.S., D.H.M. Cumming, and C.L. Redman. 2006. "Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions." Ecology and Society no. 11 (1).